Recent news from County and District Councils
There are 4 articles on this page
POLICE AUTHORITY BUDGET BID TO MAINTAIN FRONT LINE POLICINGCambridgeshire Police Authority have announced that they will be looking at the possibility of raising the policing element of local taxes by around 28% in the next financial year in order to preserve front line policing and officer numbers in the county. It is proposing that it requires this level of taxation, the equivalent of £26.50 a year extra for a Band D tax payer, to keep services going without having to go to the drastic lengths of reducing officer numbers - something the Authority is determined it does not want to do. Why is the Authority faced with having to make this recommendation? Historically Cambridgeshire Police Authority has received very low funding from the Government and over the last few years the Authority has had to look to the local taxpayers to provide the Authority with the funds it needs to maintain services in the county. In December 2002 the Home Office announced that for 2003/04 Cambridgeshire Police Authority would receive a police grant totalling £71.1m, a rise of 4.9% (£3.4m) from this financial year. This gives the Authority a total budget of £94.5m based on the levels of local taxation remaining at the current levels (i.e, a 0% increase this year). John Reynolds, Chairman of Cambridgeshire Police Authority said: " At first glance this would seem to be a positive settlement for us, in fact it was a higher settlement than we had anticipated. However we are still feeling the after effects of those years of under funding and a closer look at our budget reveals that even this rise is not enough to enable us to move forward this year. "We also know that if the Home Office had not put a ceiling on the amount of grant they were awarding this year that Cambridgeshire would have in fact received a rise of 8.2% rather than 4.9% - this is equal to an extra £2.3m which would have been a much fairer settlement." As well as losing out on this capped money, Cambridgeshire Police Authority knows that there are a number of significant additional costs that it has to meet this year over and above last years costs - many of which have been set by Government. These include: Police and support staff pay rises (set nationally), New competency, priority and bonus payments (set nationally), Increased National Insurance contributions (set nationally), Increased pension requirements General goods and services inflation. John Reynolds said: "These increases, which we cannot avoid, will cost us over £4million extra in the next financial year. This is over half a million pounds more than we have received in the grant , so it becomes obvious that we are already on the back foot and this is before operational issues are even taken into account." The Authority also needs to consider operational funding pressures that the Force faces, including the ongoing costs of Operation Fincham and public order policing, meaning that just to keep policing services standing still in Cambridgeshire there is the need for an additional £10m. Cambridgeshire Police Authority does not want to burden the County's taxpayers with meeting this entire short fall in funding, therefore it has worked closely with the Force to identify around £3.4m of possible further reductions to current expenditure. John Reynolds said: "The only way we can reduce the short fall between what we need to maintain levels of service and what the Government says we should be spending is to reduce the amount we have to spend on the services we already provide. We have identified a number of areas where reductions in current expenditure are possible without reducing front line policing numbers. These include: A reduction in police overtime funds Deferring a project to modernise custody suites in the county Reducing the amount of contingency funds held for policing public order demonstrations and ongoing major criminal investigations Deferral of vehicle replacement A reduction in Police Authority expenditure A reduction in funds available for partnership initiatives Making reductions to the support staff budget Force wide John Reynolds said: "People should not underestimate how difficult it has been to identify these reductions in expenditure. They will all have some affect on the Force's ability to maintain the service levels that they currently provide for the people of Cambridgeshire. Many of the reductions that have been agreed upon also bring an element of risk into the budget - risk that if there is another major incident there may not be the funds available to pay for it. "If the Authority were to look at how it could make further reductions to expenditure, it would be in the realms of having to make cuts that would have very serious effects on the ability of the Force to police the area - such as reductions to officer numbers." These reductions leave the Authority with having an available budget of £94.5m to fund a requirement of £100.9m which equals a £6.5m short fall that the Authority proposes will need to be met by taxpayers through the local precept. To meet this would require a 28% rise in precept on 2002/03 which is around £26.50 a year for the average Band D property. "This certainly isn't positive news. Last year the Authority was able to tell people that it would receive additional services for the 39% precept increase, but this year the facts are that the 28% increase in precept is just to maintain services with no extras, in fact with some reductions. "It is also worth noting that if we had received the full allocation that Government had assessed that Cambridgeshire required (8.2% increase), this precept rise would have been 10% lower." Further issues to consider The Authority also wants to make the public aware of a further potential issue that they are having to consider - that of replenishing the funds used during Operation Fincham (Soham) and for policing animal rights protests in the county. In November the Police Authority and Constabulary made a joint bid to the Home Office to cover the costs of these extraordinary operations, which cost around £6m (£5m for Operation Fincham, £1m for Animal Rights). The Authority still awaits a response from the Home Office with regards to these bids, however, the full cost has had to be met through the current available budget. This was done by making savings in year and calling on general and earmarked reserves. The Authority has been receiving pressure from the Government to ensure that all of its reserve balances are maintained in case of further major incidents, however, the Authority will struggle to do this unless its claim to the Home Office gets a positive response. If the Authority has to recover the whole of its reserves, requiring an additional £6.5m, through local taxation, this would need a further 28% precept increase. This means a potential 56% total precept increase - around £53 a year for Band D taxpayers. John Reynolds said: " We still have not heard from the Home Office with regards to our claims but we do expect full recompense for these additional and exceptional costs and therefore it is essential that we get an answer by the end of January so we know whether we are going to have to levy additional tax to cover these costs. "If we do not get a response the Police Authority will have to make a decision about whether to risk running with virtually no reserve funds." Consultation on proposal Cambridgeshire Police Authority wants to hear the views of local residents with regards to the proposals that it is putting forward by asking them to answer the following question by choosing the answer that they agree with.
Question Do you support the Cambridgeshire Police Authority's proposal to increaselocal taxation by 28% in order to preserve front line policing in Cambridgeshire?
Answer People can answer this question by sending their response in writing to Clerk of Cambridgeshire Police Authority, Jubilee House, Falconers Chase, Wymondham, NR18 0WW Also, in the coming days the consultation will be available on-line at the Authority's web site - www.cambs-pa.gov.uk, and it will also be available in leaflet form from local libraries. The final decision on the level of precept will be made by the Authority in early February so all responses must reach us by the end of January. |
OPENING THE DOOR ON HOME LIBRARY SERVICECambridgeshire Libraries and Information Service's Doorstep Service has gone from strength to strength with record numbers of housebound people receiving books, movies and music, in their own home. The Doorstep Service is designed to ensure that people who can't get to a Library - perhaps because of ill health or mobility problems - can still access the thousands of print and talking books, videos and other items available for loan in County Council Libraries. The service now reaches around 500 people across the county who receive books, tapes and videos that are delivered by a team of 250 volunteers working in four teams based throughout Cambridgeshire. The volunteers are recruited and trained by four Doorstep co-ordinators. Area Doorstep Co-ordinator Hilary Firth, said: "The Doorstep Service has continued grow and we are now providing an important free service to nearly 500 people who would normally have great difficulty accessing the thousands of different books, music CDs and videos, available in libraries. We are delighted by the success of the scheme." The scheme is organised in four geographical areas around Cambridgeshire and as a first step people - or family and carers on their behalf - should contact the appropriate co-ordinator. A visit will then be arranged to discuss people's needs and match them with a suitable visitor who will once a month visit with items requested and to return previously loaned items. All the visitors carry identification to ensure people only allow bone fide visitors into their home. In Cambridge/South Cambridgeshire contact Hilary Firth (01223) 718358; Jenni Johns in East Cambridgeshire (01353) 616169; Hilary Butler in Fenland on (01354) 754766 or in Huntingdon call Diane Rutherford on (01480) 375023. One new recipient of the service wrote recently to the local co-ordinator, saying: "I feel I must write immediately to tell you what a wonderful shot in the arm your visit was today. Thank you for your kindness, your expertise and clarity. Being crippled and now housebound has tried me sorely. It was a small miracle to have you here, a 'dea ex machina.' The winter looms ahead, with shortening days, feelings of loneliness increasing. Suddenly you offered me a cornucopia of books. You have cheered me so much. Thank you for the lifeline you have thrown me. I cannot, right now, believe my good fortune." To find out more about the Doorstep Service contact the relevant area co-ordinator listed above. |
Waste Management SchemeSouth Cambridgeshire District Council, Cambridgeshire County Council and Peterborough have together succeeded in a bid to the Waste Minimisation and Recycling Fund. The District Council’s bid was for £1.8 million which has been awarded in full. The success of the bid means that South Cambridgeshire residents will now be given “wheelie bins” which we could not have afforded without this money. Each household is to be given two bins each of 52.7 gallon size. One will be black for general waste and the other for green waste, such as vegetable peelings and garden weeds, and cardboard. This is not going to be imposed on anyone but part of the money is to convert the refuse freighters to handle the new bins. It also means reducing the danger to the workforce from sharp objects in sacks or injury from manual handling. Larger households can buy extra 32.5 gallon bins from the Council and those who live on their own or in sheltered housing can have one of these smaller bins instead of the big ones. We know that those who live in flats or wherever there are storage difficulties, wheelie bins may not be the answer so sacks will continue to be provided for those who want them. A survey in 2000-2001 had shown that most residents did not like the black sack method of refuse disposal. The waste managers do not like them either because the polythene takes thousands of years to decompose preventing the contents from rotting-down as well. When one of the old tip-sites at Milton was opened to re-cycle its contents, instead of leaving it in land-fill, the print was quite clear on newspapers which had been buried for 20 years. The County Council must meet the Government’s target of 33% of refuse to be recycled by the end of this year. In fact with the new bins, South Cambridgeshire’s recycling will be near 40%. The green-box paper collection will continue as will the home-composting programme. Residents will start being notified immediately about the details of the new schemes. The new bins are far larger than sacks so the collection will be each fortnight with the green-bin waste being collected on the week in between. The experience of many Councils which gather their waste in this way shows that they had not experienced major difficulties. In summer there may be problems but the whole scheme will be kept under continuous review. Other issues still being worked out are: how will sacks be collected in future; what happens when residents leave boxes “side waste” next to their bins for collection; and the recycling credit scheme for Parish Councils.
|
POLICE AUTHORITY AGREES 19.8% PRECEPT INCREASE"A balance between what the Constabulary required and what the public of Cambridgeshire were prepared to pay." That is how Cambridgeshire Police Authority are describing their decision to increase the policing element of local taxation by 19.8%, which was made at a meeting held at Police Headquarters, Huntingdon, yesterday evening. This final decision by the Authority means that Band D Council Tax payers can expect to pay an additional 36p a week / £18.72p a year towards the policing element of their Council Tax bill. This rise provides a total policing budget for 2003/04 of just over £99m an additional £7.1m for the Constabulary compared with 2002/03. John Reynolds, Chairman of Cambridgeshire Police Authority said: "We know that this is a substantial rise for taxpayers to maintain current police officer numbers, especially as there will be no extra police officers. However, we have listened to local people who told us throughout our consultation campaign that they didn't want to pay the 28% increase that we had proposed and we have done all we can to reduce the precept to this lower amount." What will the additional 19.8% pay for? The Authority has had to allow for an increase in its basic costs compared to the current financial year, most of which are due to Government enforced changes, for example:
An important addition to the budget this year is an Innovation fund of £0.5m. This will allow the Constabulary to apply for Government funding in situations where Government only part fund an initiative, e.g, Community Support Officers, the fund being available to meet the balance of the cost. The proposed budget will also provide funding for some new and very important developments, e.g,
John Reynolds said: "Each of these items is very important in ensuring that the Constabulary is able to meet Government standards in much of its work and importantly to enable it to share information with other forces, creating a greater chance of catching criminals in the County. "We know that for each item we have been able to provide for there are many other important ones that we have not been able to offer the funding for. However, we have worked with the Constabulary to ensure that the most important items are provided for." The agreed budget also provides £1.1m which is to be spent under the direction of the Chief Constable, in consultation with the Authority. This portion of the budget gives the Chief Constable the opportunity to decide where he most needs these resources to be used. For example he may choose to introduce new roles or equipment, or may decide not to go ahead with all of the reductions to expenditure that had been examined previously.(*1) John Reynolds said: "The Authority felt it was very important to give the Chief Constable a degree of flexibility over how some of the agreed budget would be spent. This was agreed in recognition that the Chief Constable can use his operational position to decide how those funds could be best spent to the benefit of the policing service in Cambridgeshire." (*2) Funds have also been set aside in this budget to deal with the ongoing costs of Operation Fincham (Soham) and policing animal rights protests in the County. Although resources will be very tight in the coming year the Authority believes that with the continued commitment of the Constabulary and its staff, policing in Cambridgeshire can continue to a high standard. John Reynolds said: "We know that this is a substantial rise in taxation for local residents to bear, but we hope people can see that we really have done everything possible to reduce the burden on the taxpayer. "Our demands for further funding from the Home Office were listened to for the first time this year - but it will take a while before the years of underfunding are balanced out and we have policing levels equal to other forces. It is also worth remembering that if the Government had not set a ceiling on the police grant and we had received our full allocation of funding we would have only been asking for just over 10%. "We will keep pushing for better funding for Cambridgeshire and hope residents of the County will join us in that." Notes:
*2 - A decision on exactly what this £1.1m will be spent on has not been made at this stage but will be for the Chief Constable, in consultation with the Authority, to decide over the coming weeks. This year for the first time the Authority has agreed to take up its borrowing allowance as part of the budget. The policing element of local taxation, the precept, is only around 10% of the total local taxation bill that local residents will pay. These costs come into effect from April 1st. All Cambridgeshire and Peterborough residents will receive a bill detailing what property band their property comes under and exactly what they will have to pay. Band D is used as an example. |